|
SITES
 |
Greatham, Teesside, UK |
 |
West Site, Billingham, UK |
 |
Grimsby, Humberside, UK |
 |
Calais, France |
 |
Huelva, Spain |
 |
Scarlino, Italy |
 |
Teluk Kalung, Malaysia |
 |
Umbogintwini, South Africa |
 |
Lake Charles, USA |
 |
Burnie, Tasmania |
|
Index
by Category
Appendices
References
|
Burnie, Tasmania
Recommendations for Future Biodiversity Management
These recommendations are based on field surveys carried out by George
Best and Ken Smith (Smith 1997) and a detailed report by Wapstra & Hopkins
2000).
- Flora and fauna should continue to be monitored with particular
reference to indigenous crayfish and endemic birds and mammals. Terrestrial
insects such as butterflies are also under recorded and require further
work.
- Regeneration has been excellent following the wildfire of February
2000, however, in order to conserve species diversity and abundance
habitat management should not include deliberate burning for at least
10-15 years.
- Areas with rainforest species present should never be
managed by burning and should be protected as far as possible from
wildfires.
- More effective sediment traps should be used on drainage
lines to reduce sedimentation in the creeks. High levels of sediment
can adversely
affect invertebrates such as crayfish.
- Old growth forest e.g. tall
mature trees and dense shrub layers should be protected. These are
statewide important habitats for birds, mammals
and other wildlife.
- There should be a phased removal of exotic vegetation
such as Pinus radiata and the areas allowed to re-vegetate with indigenous
flora.
- Cattle should not be allowed to graze the site as this will
almost certainly lead to a reduction in biodiversity value.
- More detailed recommendations are given in Wapstra & Hopkins
2000.
|